Get reliable rangeland science

Introduction to Grazing Management

Introduction to Grazing Management

 

In this section you'll find information about:


Principles of Grazing Management

Written by Rachel Frost and Jeff Mosley, Montana State University; Updated by Beth Burritt, Utah State University 4-12-16

Managing rangelands is both art and science. Scientific knowledge is combined with practical local experience to find solutions to specific management problems. This section will focus on how science can be used to manage grazing animals

Grazing management entails managing how grazing animals, forage plants, and soils interact to meet specific ecological and economic objectives. A successful grazing manager needs to know how plants grow and reproduce if he wants to understand how grazing animals affect plants by the amount of plant material removed, hoof action, and other aspects of grazing. In addition, managers must understand the grazing animal, specifically its nutritional needs at critical points of the production cycle and its behavior including diet selection.

Managers need to consider the following:

  • When should grazing occur? (timing)
  • How often should grazing occur? (frequency)
  • How much forage should be removed, or how much residual plant material should remain after grazing? (intensity)

How plants respond to grazing is determined by the timing, intensity, and frequency of grazing as well as the physiological and morphological characteristics of plants and how these characteristics affect plant growth before and after grazing.

Timing of grazing (When should I graze). Grazing managers should avoid grazing an area at the same stage of plant growth year after year. Changing the timing of grazing prevents repeated defoliation during critical periods of plant growth, which benefits the plant. The most critical growth stages are when plants are beginning to grow in the spring or fall and particularly when plants are initiating regrowth after grazing. The growth of additional leaves and/or the regrowth of leaves require(s) energy from the plant. The plant also needs to store energy for future growth. The first two or three leaves that appear on a plant after a dormant period uses energy stored from the previous growing season. Plants need adequate leaf tissue to produce enough energy to meet both growth and storage needs. If grazing managers are unable to change the season of grazing so plants have enough leaf area to meet their energy needs for plant growth and storage, then managers may need to reduce the intensity or frequency of defoliation (grazing).

Grazing during winter, when plants are dormant, has few if any adverse physiological effects on plants unless grazing intensity and/or trampling are so severe they remove or damage the basal buds at the base of the plant that initiate growth the following spring. Moderate grazing during the dormant season may help reduce the buildup of dead plant material above the buds on plant crowns. This can benefit plant growth because more or higher quality sunlight reaches the buds and activates them to grow. Finally, managers should avoid grazing when soil moisture is excessively high for long periods because the soil can be easily compacted by trampling and become more susceptible to erosion.

Frequency of grazing (How often should I graze?) Grazing managers should avoid grazing plants too frequently during a single growing season. If plants are given an opportunity to regrow and replenish their stored energy reserves after grazing, they can be grazed again or more during a single growing season. Regrowth can be abundant under following conditions:

  • when soil moisture is adequate for plant growth,
  • soil and air temperatures are optimum for plant growth,
  • soil fertility is good, and
  • grazed plants can produce new leaves after being grazed.

However, in arid areas where soil moisture for plant growth is inadequate most of the year, grazing more than once a year may be harmful to plants.

If grazing occurs too infrequently, the accumulation of too much dead material will hinder plant growth. The plant's growth potential is compromised because an insufficient amount of sunlight reaches plant buds to initiate tiller growth, and/or many of the leaves do not receive the maximum amount of sunlight. Long periods of no or limited grazing also can cause the nutritional quality of the plant to decline.

Intensity of grazing (How much of the plant should be grazed?) Grazing managers should avoid removing too much of a plant's leaf area. Leaf blades are the main sites of energy production for the plant. If the leaf area that remains after grazing is very small or the growing points located at the base of the leaf blade is removed, the plant may be unable to regrow and replenish its energy reserves. This is likely to occur if soil moisture levels are low and not replenished shortly after grazing. Also, grazing managers should leave enough residual dry matter to prevent soil erosion and to protect the plant's roots and stem bases from excessive cold or heat. Intense defoliation of plants, particularly if it occurs frequently, can reduce a plant's leaf area for a long enough period that the plant cannot store enough energy to form the buds needed for next year's growth and/or sustain the buds through long dormant periods.

Herbivory

Herbivory, or grazing, is a powerful ecological process that can influence the amount and kinds of vegetation present on the landscape. This occurs primarily because herbivores graze selectively, choosing some plants or parts of plants over others, which alters the competitive ability of plants. Continued heavy grazing can decrease palatable, preferred plants while allowing unpalatable, poisonous, or invasive plants to increase in the community. By controlling the species of herbivore and the timing, frequency and intensity of grazing, managers can shift a forb-dominated system to a grass-dominated system and vice versa. "Targeted grazing" is the use of grazing animals to accomplish specific vegetation management goals through strict control of the species of grazing animal, timing of grazing, and intensity or frequency of grazing.

The absence of herbivory can also be a valuable vegetation management tool. The absence of herbivory, whether through delayed grazing or complete rest periods, is designed to improve the forage stand. Non-grazing periods can be assigned to specific pastures or worked into a planned rotation system. The benefits of planned, non-grazing depend upon the time of year it is implemented:

  • Early spring — enhance leaf production by plants
  • Spring — enhance plant re-growth when conditions are optimal
  • Summer — allow for seed production
  • Autumn — improve carbohydrate production and storage, particularly if summer dormant grasses had fall re-growth
  • Yearlong — enable seedlings to establish, increase vigor of preferred species, accumulate fine fuels for prescribed burning.

A regularly scheduled or occasional deferment can help range types such as mid-grass, semi-desert bunchgrass, sagebrush-grass, and mountain grasslands to increase forage plant vigor, plant reproduction, and general range condition.

The term "rest" is used in grazing management to denote a full year (12 months) of no grazing. This allows the plants to undergo a complete growth cycle without being grazed. The benefits of rest are best realized in special management situations such as:

  • severe drought
  • following reseeding
  • providing fuel for prescribed burns
  • when critical site rehabilitation is required.

How Plants Respond to Grazing

While strategies to cope with grazing vary greatly between plant species, plants in general either avoid grazing or tolerate grazing. Plants avoid grazing by diminishing their accessibility or palatability to herbivores. Thorns, hairs, or secondary compounds in some plants are examples of avoidance mechanisms. Plants that tolerate grazing have effective mechanisms to facilitate regrowth following defoliation. Grasses are usually considered to have the highest grazing tolerance.

Plants that withstand grazing generally have one or more of the following characteristics:

  • Growing points are low, or elevation of growing points is delayed.
  • Plants have a high ratio of vegetative-to-reproductive shoots.
  • Apical meristems are activated, and new root growth is initiated following defoliation.

Range plants can be classified by how they respond to grazing pressure. The amount of grazing pressure that a plant can withstand depends on how much it is preferred by grazing animals. The species of grazing animal may also influence how a plant responds to grazing because different species have different dietary preferences and eating behaviors.

Decreaser plants are the first plants to die out under continued heavy grazing. These plants decrease because they are either sought out by grazing animals due to their high palatability or they lack physiological attributes that help them recover from grazing. Highly preferred plants are the first to be grazed, and animals may repeatedly graze these plants throughout the growing season.

Increaser plants generally increase their number as decreaser plants decline. Many increaser plants can avoid grazing damage because they grow close to the ground or are less palatable than decreasers. Increasers often also possess physiological mechanisms that help them recover from grazing. These plants should be monitored because they are a sign of high grazing pressure and can increase in number and abundance beyond what is desirable. If overuse continues, even increaser plants may decline in the community.

Invader plants are commonly weedy plants that become established because more desirable plants have declined due to excessive grazing. A high proportion of invader plants in a community is usually a sign of overgrazing. However, some noxious rangeland weeds, such as leafy spurge and spotted knapweed, are capable of invading healthy rangeland plant communities.

Effects of Grazing or Defoliation

The effects of grazing or any other form of defoliation on a grass plant are directly related to how grasses grow. These effects depend upon the following:

Intensity and Frequency of Grazing: Grazing (defoliation, trampling, or other losses) intensity is the amount (percentage) of plant tissue removed by grazing animals. Frequency refers to how often a plant is grazed. Most perennial grass plants can tolerate either heavy grazing or frequent grazing but not both simultaneously. When grazing removes most of the leaf tissue, and when it occurs repeatedly, plant health is threatened and plants are more likely to suffer stress or even death. Frequent heavy grazing results in a plant with little leaf area for most of the growing season. This has two adverse effects if it happens repeatedly across several years. First, when the leaf area is repeatedly grazed 50% or more, the root system will decrease in size. Fewer roots mean the plant extracts less water and nutrients from the soil and has less growth potential. Second, the smaller leaf area is unable to produce enough soluble carbohydrates (energy reserves) to develop buds capable of surviving the winter dormant period and produce the first one to three leaves the following spring. Without sufficient stored energy to keep the basal buds alive and produce the initial green leaves in spring, the plant will die.

Season of Grazing: The time of year when animals graze a plant affects the plant's ability to tolerate defoliation. Grazing when plants are still in the vegetative stage, particularly early- to mid-growth, is less harmful because the growing points are rarely removed and there is normally enough soil moisture for regrowth. The plant can complete its growth cycle (unless it is repeatedly grazed) and store enough energy reserves to survive the winter and produce the first few leaves the next spring. However, grazing when plants are in their early reproductive or "boot stage" of growth removes the apical and intercalary meristems (growing points) responsible for plant growth. When these meristems are removed, regrowth must initiate from the axillary buds at the base of the plant. This is a much slower process that requires moisture and nutrients, generally at a time when soil moisture is rapidly disappearing. Growing conditions also influence response to defoliation. Plants withstand defoliation best when soil moisture and fertility are high. Drought or other environmental stress will decrease the amount of new leaf and tiller production following defoliation, which can hasten plant death.

Competition from Other Plants Competition from neighboring plants for moisture, nutrients, and light can intensify the effects of grazing. Plants can tolerate grazing better when neighboring plants are also defoliated. Herbivores, however, graze selectively, often defoliating one plant and leaving others nearby ungrazed. Repeated, selective grazing of a community's more palatable plants can result in their decline and an increase of less palatable and/or less productive species. The replacement species are likely to be weeds, some of which are toxic to livestock.

When Is Grazing Good for Plants? Properly managed grazing can benefit plants and ecosystems in several ways. A lack of disturbance or defoliation can result in a buildup of dead plant material that "chokes" new plant growth. The result is overgrown decadent plants that produce less biomass (forage), have fewer seeds, provide less nutritional value to herbivores, and are less resilient to disturbance, disease, and insects.

Austin Rutherford

Who is Involved in Fire Management & Policy Making?

Who is Involved in Fire Management & Policy Making?

Administration of Fire Regimes 

" ...Institutions, not merely policies, of fire protection have rapidly and probably irreversibly undergone a metamorphosis. The evidence lies all around. Privatization, partnerships, the devolution of political decision making to more local jurisdictions, indigenous land claims, a near civil war over the destiny of the public domain- all are changing the attributes of how government administers these lands and how they cope with fire."
(Tending Fire: Coping with America's Wildland Fires. by Stephen J. Pyne, 2004, pg. 164).

 A Brief History of United States Fire Policy

From the creation of the Forest Reserves at the turn of the last century through the 1970's the USDA Forest Service was the preeminent wildland fire agency commanding the bulk of the nations firefighting resources and directing its fire research. While critics became vocal as early as the 1930's, the agency's policy during these 60 years was one of suppression (Pyne 1997). With the surge of environmental legislation in the late 1960's and the establishment of wilderness reserves, policies supported letting backcountry fires burn and reintroducing flame via prescribed fire. With this shift also came greater inter-agency coordination on fire management. By the 1990's on the heals of some devastating escaped prescribed fires and a general population increase adjacent to wildlands, the nation's resources turned to the control of fire in the wildland-urban interface. New forms of collaboration between federal, state, and local fire insitutions became essential. As one devastating fire season follows another, we now know that some fires, given current fuel loads and climatic conditions, may be beyond our control.

  • Fire Policies and Legislation
  • Fire Management at the Federal Level
  • State and Local Fire Management
  • Private institutions and Collaborative Groups
BLM

Wildland Fire Statistics

Wildland Fire Statistics

Where? How Big? How Much Money?

The earth's fire problem is one of maldistribution. There is too much of the wrong kind of fire in the wrong places or at the wrong times, and not enough of the right kind of fire at the right places and times. (World Fire: The Culture of Fire on Earth by Stephen J. Pyne, 1997, pg. 5-6)

In 2006, the largest US wildfire occured in Texas, burning over 900,000 acres of grassland. Acres burned by prescription were greatest in Alabama and Florida. In 2006 the USDA Forest Service reported spending over 1.5 billion dollars on wildfire suppression (NIFC). Wildfire is not unique to the US. Russia, Australia, and Canada also experience large and frequent wildfires (Pyne 2004). Want the latest on fires around the country and around the world? These sites provide up to the day information.

  • Current U.S. Wildland Fire Information: The National Interagency Fire Center. Find out where fires are burning right now. Learn how many acres have burned each year since 1960. Learn what the annual costs have been for fighting fires. find out how much prescribed burning is occuring in your state. This site is the place to go for information.
     
  • Current Global Fire Status: The Global Fire Monitoring Center. Where are fires occuring in the world? How do other countries cope with fire? The Global Fire Monitoring Center Offers Statistics, News, Maps, and other resources.
NOAA - National Centers for Environmental Information

Rangeland/wildland-Urban Interface: Whose Responsibility?

Rangeland/wildland-Urban Interface: Whose Responsibility?

The wildland-urban interface (WUI) is the zone where structures and other human development meet or intermingle with undeveloped wildland or vegetative fuels (NIFC). Currently in the United States it includes 9.4 % of the land area and 38.5 % of all housing units and growing, with the largest number of homes in California (Radeloff et al. 2005). These areas pose the greatest threats to lives and property, pitting the fierceness of wildland fires against often indefensible homes, lacking the proper protections that could reduce fire risk. These fires often occur in locations that slip between the jurisdictions of urban and wildland fire agencies and outside effective county or rural fire districts, requiring action by outside agencies at the nation's expense (Pyne 2006, pg. 275). Such situations raise questions about who should pay for the protection of these homes from wildfire? What responsibilities should landowners have for the protection of their homes? Is building in a fire zone equivalent to building in a floodplain or at the base of a volcano? The wildland-urban interface has forced new forms of collaboration between the various fire agencies. Community wildfire protection plans now pose the greatest hope for defining roles and responsibilities before the flames come lapping.

BLM

The Basics of Fire & Fire Terminology

The Basics of Fire & Fire Terminology

The complexity of jurisdictions and sheer number of individuals involved in the management of wildland fire requires the establishment of a common lexicon of terms. For those unfamiliar with fire terminology we offer links to a widely accepted glossary of terms and provide connections to training materials highlighting fire fundamentals.

George Ruyle

Fire as a Tool in Land Management

Fire as a Tool in Land Management

Fire, if properly controlled and managed, can be a valuable tool to manipulate vegetation composition, structure, and fuel loads on rangelands (and other wildland ecosystems). Managed fire can create and maintain a mosaic of plant communities, at appropriate locations on the landscape, to provide valuable ecological services that benefit many rangeland resources. Among these are:

  1. “cleaning” or removing unwanted vegetation from landscapes to reduce fuel loads and the risk of large catastrophic fires
  2. changing the relative balance between herbaceous (grasses and forbs) and woody plants to improve forage availability for livestock or wildlife
  3. changing the structure or size class of plants across appropriate distances to benefit wildlife
  4. creating variability both within and among plant communities for wildlife and other rangeland resources
  5. promoting seed germination and the regeneration of desired plants; and
  6. maintaining the hydrologic cycle to promote the infiltration of water and to prevent rapid runoff and accelerated erosion.

The use of fire as a management tool requires that it be applied at the correct frequency (return interval), intensity (heat release), and spatial scale so that burned and unburned patches remain on the landscape. A mosaic of burned and unburned patches typically results in a mix of early- to late-seral communities, which benefits more rangeland resources than a homogeneous landscape of either early- or late-seral plant communities.

The Importance of Fire Intervals

Prior to European settlement of North America, most American rangelands burned periodically. The return interval between fires varied widely among different rangeland ecosystems (e.g., tall-grass prairie, sagebrush steppe, ponderosa pine forest) but was relatively constant within an ecosystem. Some pre-settlement fires were caused by lightning, but others were intentionally set by Native Americans to achieve vegetation management objectives. Because fire, regardless of the source, was a recurring ecological event with a relatively constant interval, most rangeland vegetation has adapted to periodic burning. After a fire, the vegetation usually forms early-seral plant communities. If there are few unburned "islands," wildlife species that need mid- to late-seral plant communities to complete their annual life cycle cannot inhabit the area or they have very small populations. The same ecological effect occurs when fire return intervals become so short that mid- and late-seral plant communities never become established. Excessively long or short fire return intervals create uniform plant communities across large landscapes and tend to exclude (or dramatically reduce) the wildlife species that need a diverse habitat structure created by a mosaic of early- to late-seral plant communities.

Modern fire return intervals on most rangelands are either longer or shorter than the pattern that evolved prior to settlement. This has resulted in undesired vegetation changes that often adversely affect rangeland resources. Fire return intervals that are substantially longer than the evolved interval lead to a substantial increase in shrubs and/or trees (woody fuel) and a decline in many desired grasses and forbs. The long life span of most shrubs and trees, combined with the slow decomposition (compared to herbaceous vegetation) of their dead branches, stems, and leaves creates large fuel loads and a fuel ladder that can carry a fire into the upper canopy of the vegetation. Horizontal and vertical continuity of the vegetation (fuel), combined with excessive fuel loads, can result in large, intense wildfires across tens of thousands of acres or more. In the western United States, it is becoming increasingly common for individual fires to burn 100,000 to 200,000 acres or more.

Public land management agencies and some private owners of range and forestland are increasing their effort to thin the woody vegetation on land they administer or manage. Their goal is to reduce wildfire risks and create plant communities that are more resilient to insects, disease, and the inevitable wildfire that will occur. Treatments that thin shrub- and tree-dominated communities not only reduce fuel loads but can also provide large volumes of woody biomass for an alternative fuel for society. According to a recent national study, about 8.4 billion tons of dry biomass resides on range and forest lands, but only 60 million dry tons can be removed annually with current fuel reduction methodologies (USDOE and USDA, 2005). At the current removal rate, it will take at least 140 years to reduce woody fuel loads; thus, additional large-scale catastrophic fires are inevitable in many areas.

Amber Dalke

Fire Management: What Are Our Options?

Fire Management: What Are Our Options?

"On these landscapes four options exist for fire management... Simply put: You can do nothing, and leave the fires to God and nature. You can try to exclude fires and suppress those that do break out. You can do the burning yourself. Or you can change the combustibility of the landscape such that fires, whether from accident, arson, lightning, or prescription behave in ways you favor...Proper fire management requires bits of each, mixed to proportions suitable to the taste of particular sites."
(Tending Fire: Coping with America's Wildland Fires by Stephen J. Pyne, 2004, pg. 69).

Science can help us understand historic fire regimes, describe the benefits and impacts to ecosystems from different fire scenarios, and model fire behavior. Only humans can decide their role in fire management. Resource and property damage compel suppression, but at what cost? Some fires probably should be started or allowed to burn. How do we decide which ones? Thinning overgrown brush and forests can help prevent catastrophic crown fire. Can this be done in an ecologically sensitive manner that we all agree upon? How widely should it be applied? What role does wildfire play in global climate change and how do we decide when open fire is threatening public health? Decisions about how to respond to fire will be political ones based on society's values.

Kim McReynolds

Fire

Fire

As appreciation of the important ecological role played by fire has increased, so has the debate over how to respond to wildfire and when to use prescribed fire as a management tool. Some fear that fire has become a panacea, and risks being applied indiscriminately. Others point to the successful achievement of management goals when prescriptions are right. For certain, more people are living on and adjacent to highly flammable range and forest lands creating formidable challenges for fire management. Some fires given current fuel loads are beyond our control. How will we respond to fire? Here are links to basic fire concepts, information about fire management, and highlights of some of the burning issues related to fire on Western Rangelands.

Kim McReynolds

Climate & Drought

Climate & Drought

Rangelands across the globe are tightly coupled with local and regional climates, benefitting from periods of enhanced precipitation and suffering during prolonged drought periods. Climate variability and change pose unique challenges to livestock producers, pastoralists and land managers the world over. An increased understanding of large-scale modes of climate variability like the El Niño-Southern Oscillation have improved seasonal forecasts and can aid in rangeland drought planning and preparedness efforts, helping to sustain production operations and guide land stewardship. A changing climate shifting towards warmer conditions and increasing hydroclimatic variability is further raising the stakes on becoming ‘climate-smart’ in using climate monitoring and forecast information in managing rangelands.

The National Drought Mitigation Center University of Nebraska-Lincoln

The Twelve Soil Orders

The Twelve Soil Orders

 

Alfisols

Alfisols are moderately leached soils that have relatively high native fertility. These soils have formed primarily under forest and have a subsurface horizon in which clays have accumulated. Alfisols are found mostly in temperate humid and subhumid regions of the world.

Alfisols occupy ~10.1% of the global ice-free land area. In the United States, they account for ~13.9% of the land area. Alfisols support about 17% of the world's population.

The combination of generally favorable climate and high native fertility allows Alfisols to be productive soils for both agricultural and silvicultural use.

Alfisols are divided into five suborders: Aqualfs, Cryalfs, Udalfs, Ustalfs, and Xeralfs.

Adapted from: The Twelve Soil Orders: Alfisols. University of Idaho, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.


Andisols

Andisols are soils that have formed in volcanic ash or other volcanic ejecta. They differ from those of other soil orders in that they typically are dominated by glass and short-range-order colloidal weathering products such as allophane, imogolite, and ferrihydrite (minerals). As a result, andisols have andic properties - unique chemical and physical properties that include high water-holding capacity and the ability to "fix" (and make unavailable to plants) large quantities of phosphorus.

Globally, Andisols are the least extensive soil order and account for only about 1% of the ice-free land area. They occupy about 1.7% of the U.S. land area, including some productive forests in the Pacific Northwest region.

Andisols are divided into eight suborders: Aquands, Gelands, Cryands, Torrands, Xerands, Vitrands, Ustands, and Udands.

Adapted from: The Twelve Soil Orders: Andisols. University of Idaho, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences. 


Aridisols

Aridisols are calcium carbonate-containing soils of arid regions that exhibit at least some subsurface horizon development. They are characterized by being dry most of the year and having limited leaching. Aridisols contain subsurface horizons in which clays, calcium carbonate, silica, salts, and/or gypsum have accumulated. Materials such as soluble salts, gypsum, and calcium carbonate tend to be leached from soils of moister climates.

Aridisols occupy about 12% of the Earth's ice-free land area and about 8.3% of the United States.

Aridisols are used mainly for range, wildlife, and recreation. Because of the dry climate in which they are found, they are not used for agricultural production unless irrigation water is available.

Aridisols are divided into seven suborders: Cryids, Salids, Durids, Gypsids, Argids, Calcids, and Cambids.

Adapted from: The Twelve Soil Orders: Aridisols. University of Idaho, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.


Entisols

Entisols are soils of recent origin. The central concept is that these soils developed in unconsolidated parent material with usually no genetic horizons except an A horizon. All soils that do not fit into one of the other 11 orders are entisols. Thus, they are characterized by great diversity, both in environmental setting and land use.

Many entisols are found in steep, rocky settings. However, entisols of large river valleys and associated shore deposits provide cropland and habitat for millions of people worldwide.

Globally, entisols are the most extensive of the soil orders, occupying about 18% of the Earth's ice-free land area. In the United States, entisols occupy about 12.3% of the land area.

Entisols are divided into six suborders: Wassents, Aquents, Arents, Psamments, Fluvents, and Orthents.

Adapted from: The Twelve Soil Orders: Entisols. University of Idaho, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.


Gelisols

Gelisols are soils of very cold climates that contain permafrost within 2 meters of the surface. These soils are limited geographically to the high-latitude polar regions and localized areas at high mountain elevations. Because of the extreme environment in which they are found, Gelisols support only about 0.4% of the world's population — the lowest percentage of any of the soil orders.

Gelisols are estimated to occupy about 9.1% of the Earth's ice-free land area and about 8.7% of the United States. Although some Gelisols may occur on very old land surfaces, they show relatively little morphological development. Low soil temperatures cause soil-forming processes such as decomposition of organic materials to proceed very slowly. As a result, most Gelisols store large quantities of organic carbon; only soils of wetland ecosystems contain more organic matter. Gelisols of the dry valleys of Antarctica are an exception; they occur in a desert environment with no plants and consequently contain very low quantities of organic carbon.

The frozen condition of Gelisol landscapes makes them sensitive to human activities.

Gelisols are divided into three suborders: Histels, Turbels, and Orthels.

Adapted from: The Twelve Soil Orders: Gelisols.University of Idaho, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.


Histosols

Histosols are soils that are composed mainly of organic materials. They contain at least 20 to 30% organic matter by weight and are more than 40 cm thick. Bulk densities are quite low, often less than 0.3 grams per cubic centimeter.

Most Histosols form in settings such as wetlands where restricted drainage inhibits the decomposition of plant and animal remains, allowing these organic materials to accumulate over time. As a result, Histosols are ecologically important because of the large quantities of carbon they contain. These soils occupy about 1.2% of the ice-free land area globally and about 1.6% of the United States.

Histosols are often referred to as peats and mucks and have physical properties that restrict their use for engineering purposes. These include low weight-bearing capacity and subsidence when drained. They are mined for fuel and horticultural products.

Histosols are divided into five suborders: Folists, Wassists, Fibrists, Saprists, and Hemists.

Adapted from: The Twelve Soil Orders: Histosols.University of Idaho, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.

Inceptisols are soils that exhibit minimal horizon development. They are more developed than Entisols but still lack the features that are characteristic of other soil orders.

Inceptisols are widely distributed and occur under a wide range of ecological settings. They are often found on fairly steep slopes, young geomorphic surfaces, and resistant parent materials. Land use varies considerably with Inceptisols. A sizable percentage of Inceptisols are found in mountainous areas and are used for forestry, recreation, and watershed.

Inceptisols occupy an estimated 15% of the global ice-free land area. Only the Entisols are more extensive. In the United States, they occupy about 9.7% of the land area. Inceptisols support about 20% of the world's population — the largest percentage of any of the soil orders.

Inceptisols are divided into seven suborders: Aquepts, Anthrepts, Gelepts, Cryepts, Ustepts, Xerepts, and Udepts.

Adapted from: The Twelve Soil Orders: Inceptisols.University of Idaho, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.

Mollisols are the soils of grassland ecosystems. They are characterized by a thick, dark surface horizon. This fertile surface horizon, known as a mollic epipedon, results from the long-term addition of organic materials derived from plant roots.

Mollisols primarily occur in the middle latitudes and are extensive in prairie regions such as the Great Plains of the United States. Globally, they occupy about 7.0% of the ice-free land area. In the United States, they are the most extensive soil order, accounting for about 21.5% of the land area.

Mollisols are among some of the most important and productive agricultural soils in the world and are extensively used for this purpose.

Mollisols are divided into eight suborders: Albolls, Aquolls, Rendolls, Gelolls, Cryolls, Xerolls, Ustolls, and Udolls.

Adapted from: The Twelve Soil Orders: Mollisols.University of Idaho, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.


Oxisols

Oxisols  are very highly weathered soils that are found primarily in the intertropical regions of the world. These soils contain few weatherable minerals and are often rich in iron (Fe) and aluminum (Al) oxide minerals.

Oxisols occupy about 7.5% of the global ice-free land area. In the United States, they only occupy about 0.02% of the land area and are restricted to Hawaii.

Most of these soils are characterized by extremely low native fertility, resulting from very low nutrient reserves, high phosphorus retention by oxide minerals, and low cation exchange capacity (CEC). Most nutrients in Oxisol ecosystems are contained in the standing vegetation and decomposing plant material. Despite low fertility, Oxisols can be quite productive with inputs of lime and fertilizers.

Oxisols are divided into five suborders: Aquox, Torrox, Ustox, Perox, and Udox.

Adapted from: The Twelve Soil Orders: Oxisols.University of Idaho, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.


Spodosols

Spodosols are acid soils characterized by a subsurface accumulation of humus that is complexed with Al and Fe. These photogenic soils typically form in coarse-textured parent material and have a light-colored E horizon overlying a reddish-brown spodic horizon. The process that forms these horizons is known as podzolization.

Spodosols often occur under coniferous forest in cool, moist climates. Globally, they occupy ~4% of the ice-free land area. In the US, they occupy ~3.5% of the land area.

Many Spodosols support forest. Because they are naturally infertile, Spodosols require additions of lime in order to be productive agriculturally.

Spodosols are divided into 5 suborders: Aquods, Gelods, Cryods, Humods, and Orthods.

Adapted from: The Twelve Soil Orders: SpodosolsUniversity of Idaho, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.


Ultisols

Ultisols are strongly leached and acidic forest soils with relatively low fertility. They are found primarily in humid temperate and tropical areas of the world, typically on older, stable landscapes. Intense weathering of primary minerals has occurred, and much calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), and potassium (K) has been leached from these soils. Ultisols have a subsurface horizon in which clays have accumulated, often with strong yellowish or reddish colors resulting from the presence of iron (Fe) oxides. The red clay soils of the southeastern United States are examples of Ultisols.

Ultisols occupy about 8.1% of the global ice-free land area and support 18% of the world's population. They are the dominant soils of much of the southeastern United States and occupy about 9.2% of the total U.S. land area.

Because of the favorable climate regimes in which they are typically found, Ultisols often support productive forests. The high acidity and relatively low quantities of plant-available Ca, Mg, and K associated with most Ultisols make them poorly suited for continuous agriculture without the use of fertilizer and lime. With these inputs, however, Ultisols can be very productive.

Ultisols are divided into five suborders: Aquults, Humults, Udults, Ustults, and Xerults.

Adapted from: The Twelve Soil Orders: Ultisols.University of Idaho, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.


Vertisols

Vertisols are clay-rich soils that shrink and swell with changes in moisture content. During dry periods, the soil volume shrinks and deep wide cracks form. The soil volume then expands as it wets up. This shrink/swell action creates serious engineering problems and generally prevents formation of distinct, well-developed horizons in these soils.

Globally, Vertisols occupy about 2.4% of the ice-free land area. In the United States, they occupy about 2.0% of the land area and occur primarily in Texas.

Vertisols are divided into six suborders: Aquerts, Cryerts, Xererts, Torrerts, Usterts, and Uderts.

Adapted from: The Twelve Soil Orders: VertisolsUniversity of Idaho, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.

University of Idaho