This review looks at the concept of utilization. It is the authors' belief that the use of utilization data to adjust management programs, particularly with a simple mathematical formula, is an oversimplification of resource management. Sharp et al. mention the development of utilization standards and notes that in spite of all the work done to date, we are no closer to specifying proper use, percentage wise, for a range area or a species than before. Sharp et al. draw from studies done in Idaho, New Mexico, and Utah. In conclusion, the authors note that rules of thumb and simplistic guides, such as utilization standards are not an acceptable substitute for experienced on the ground management, based on sound, long-term range trend information. Reliance on utilization standards alone to make management decisions is policing the range, not managing it. In lieu of time consuming utilization measurements, Sharp et al. recommend taking photographs of the range at various times of the year.
Citations and enhanced abstracts for journals articles and documents focused on rangeland ecology and management. RSIS is a collaboration between Montana State University, University of Idaho, and University of Wyoming.