Vegetative composition was measured in large pastures managed with rotational and continuous grazing systems to determine which grazing system was more appropriate to maintain or improve the condition of Texas pastures. This study was conducted during a droughty period and precipitation levels, which varied slightly by year, appeared to have a greater impact on basal area cover than grazing system treatments. However, perennial grass species composition varied by soil type, year, and grazing system. In general, rotational grazing increased perennial grass cover and decreased cover of bare ground compared to continuous grazing. This study demonstrated the benefits of rotational grazing during drought conditions. Under normal precipitation levels, benefits may be even greater. Authors concluded that rotational grazing is better than continuous grazing for range management on large Texas pastures.
Citations and enhanced abstracts for journals articles and documents focused on rangeland ecology and management. RSIS is a collaboration between Montana State University, University of Idaho, and University of Wyoming.