Get reliable rangeland science

Forage Analysis as Influenced by Sampling Position and Processing
Author
Beaty, E. R.
Miller, W. J.
Brooks, O. L
Publisher
Society for Range Management
Publication Year
1967-07-01
Body

Collecting a representative sample of conserved forage is necessary if such practices as forage testing are to be meaningful. When uniform samples of Coastal bermudagrass and alfalfa were systematically sampled in nine different ways, the coefficient of variation for crude fiber and protein averaged approximately 5%. Sampling procedures satisfactory for one species may well be unsatisfactory for another. This material was digitized as part of a cooperative project between the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. The Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information. Migrated from OJS platform August 2020

Language
en
Resource Type
Text
Document Type
Journal Issue/Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.2307/3896264
Additional Information
Beaty, E. R., Miller, W. J., & Brooks, O. L. (1967). Forage analysis as influenced by sampling position and processing. Journal of Range Management, 20(4), 256-259.
ISSN
0022-409X
OAI Identifier
oai:repository.arizona.edu:10150/647957
Journal Volume
20
Journal Number
4
Journal Pages
256-259
Collection
Rangeland Ecology & Management (REM)
Journal Name
Journal of Range Management