Bifistulated wethers (esophageal and rumen) were used to collect samples of the diet while grazing shortgrass native range. Rumen samples were obtained by grab sampling rumen contents. The rumens were not evacuated prior to sampling. The esophageal and rumen grab samples were different botanically. There were fewer forbs and more grasses found in rumen samples. The nitrogen content of rumen samples was higher than that of esophageal samples. Rumen samples were lower in in vitro dry matter digestibility than esophageal samples. Rumen grab samples cannot be expected to yield quantitative botanical information on grazing animals diet or on nitrogen content and dry matter digestibility. This material was digitized as part of a cooperative project between the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. The Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information. Migrated from OJS platform August 2020
Scholarly peer-reviewed articles published by the Society for Range Management. Access articles on a rolling-window basis from vol. 1, 1948 up to 5 years from the current year. Formerly Journal of Range Management (JRM). More recent content is available by subscription from SRM.