Applications of dicamba controlled about the same percentage of honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa Torr., var. glandulosa) as equivalent rates of 2,4,5-T in the Rolling Plains, Coastal Prairie, and South Texas Plains. Combinations of 2,4,5-T and dicamba controlled no more honey mesquite than either herbicide alone. Honey mesquite control was governed by total herbicide applied rather than relative proportions of 2,4,5-T and dicamba in combination. Dicamba was effectively substituted for 2,4,5-T in combinations with picloram. Three-way combinations were no more effective than mixtures of dicamba and picloram or 2,4,5-T and picloram. This material was digitized as part of a cooperative project between the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. The Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information. Migrated from OJS platform August 2020
Scholarly peer-reviewed articles published by the Society for Range Management. Access articles on a rolling-window basis from vol. 1, 1948 up to 5 years from the current year. Formerly Journal of Range Management (JRM). More recent content is available by subscription from SRM.