Several schedules of alternate-year grazing and rest were compared with continuous yearlong grazing and with winter rest every year on small plots over a 7-year period. Differences among treatments were not significant. Results suggest that alternate-year rest schedules do not provide enough growing season recovery time between grazing periods. This material was digitized as part of a cooperative project between the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. The Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information. Migrated from OJS platform August 2020
Scholarly peer-reviewed articles published by the Society for Range Management. Access articles on a rolling-window basis from vol. 1, 1948 up to 5 years from the current year. Formerly Journal of Range Management (JRM). More recent content is available by subscription from SRM.