Get reliable rangeland science

An Economic Analysis of Black-Tailed Prairie Dog (Cynomys ludovicianus) Control
Author
Collins, A. R.
Workman, J. P.
Uresk, D. W.
Publisher
Society for Range Management
Publication Year
1984-07-01
Body

Black-tailed prairie dog (Cynomys ludovicianus) control by poisoning with zinc phosphide was not economically feasible in the Conata Basin of South Dakota. Economic analyses were conducted from U.S. Forest Service and rancher viewpoints. Control programs were analyzed with annual maintenance or complete retreatment of initially treated areas to prevent prairie dog repopulation and, except for annual maintenance at low repopulation rates, were unable to recover initial control costs. At a prairie dog repopulation rate of 30% per year (the most realistic projection), prairie dog control was not economically feasible and annual maintenance control costs were greater than the annual value of forage gained. Control benefit was forage gained on treated areas. With an increase of approximately 51 kg/ha of cattle forage, over 7 ha of initial prairie dog control were required to gain 1 AUM per year for the life of the treatment. This material was digitized as part of a cooperative project between the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. The Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information. Migrated from OJS platform August 2020

Language
en
Resource Type
Text
Document Type
Journal Issue/Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.2307/3898711
Additional Information
Collins, A. R., Workman, J. P., & Uresk, D. W. (1984). An economic analysis of black-tailed prairie dog (Cynomys ludovicianus) control. Journal of Range Management, 37(4), 358-361.
ISSN
0022-409X
OAI Identifier
oai:repository.arizona.edu:10150/645593
Journal Volume
37
Journal Number
4
Journal Pages
358-361
Journal Name
Journal of Range Management
Keywords
forest management
rodents
cost-benefit analysis
South Dakota
prairies