Get reliable rangeland science

Field Evaluation of Five Grasses Grown on a Saline Soil
Author
Currie, P. O.
Hilken, T. O.
White, R. S.
Publisher
Society for Range Management
Publication Year
1986-09-01
Body

Russian wildrye (Psathyrostachys juncea), Altai wildrye (Leymus angustus), creeping foxtail (Alopecurus arundinaceus), and 2 forms of a bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseuduroegneria spicata) × quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) hybrid (RS-1 and RS-2) were evaluated in 1983 and 1984 for their suitability as forage for beef cattle. Hybrid selections produced 5,554 kg/ha of forage and their yields in 1983 were significantly more than those from the 2 wildryes and creeping foxtail that averaged 2,810 and 4,292 kg/ha, respectively. In 1984, there was not a significant difference among yields for the 5 grasses, but there was a significant increase in yield from 1983 for the 2 wildryes and creeping foxtail. Percent crude protein averaged 16% in the wildryes and 12.5% in the 2 hybrids and creeping foxtail in 1983. However, percent phosphorus averaged .40% in the creeping foxtail and .30% in the hybrids. In 1984, percent crude protein and phosphorus for all 5 grasses were lower than in 1983, but trends were similar. All 5 grasses exceeded the NRC crude protein and phosphorous requirement for a 500-kg lactating cow in 1983. In 1984, only the creeping foxtail and RS-1 hybrid exceeded the phosphorous requirement. In vitro organic matter digestibility averaged 64% in the ryegrasses and 54% in the hybrids for both years. In 1983, all 5 grasses exceeded the metabolizable energy requirement of a lactating 500-kg cow. Based on calculated nutritional index, Russian wildrye and Altai wildrye ranked 1 and 2 with the creeping foxtail and RS-2 hybrid ranking 4 and 5, respectively, in 1983. In 1984, Russian wildrye and the creeping foxtail ranked 1 and 2, and the RS-1 hybrid and RS-2 hybrid ranked 4 and 5. This material was digitized as part of a cooperative project between the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. The Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information. Migrated from OJS platform August 2020

Language
en
Resource Type
Text
Document Type
Journal Issue/Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.2307/3899433
Additional Information
Currie, P. O., Hilken, T. O., & White, R. S. (1986). Field evaluation of five grasses grown on a saline soil. Journal of Range Management, 39(6), 386-388.
ISSN
0022-409X
OAI Identifier
oai:repository.arizona.edu:10150/645333
Journal Volume
39
Journal Number
5
Journal Pages
386-388
Collection
Rangeland Ecology & Management (REM)
Journal Name
Journal of Range Management
Keywords
Pseudoroegneria spicata
field experimentation
Alopecurus arundinaceus
saline soils
salt tolerance
plant introduction
Leymus angustus
Elytrigia repens
Psathyrostachys juncea
in vitro digestibility
Montana
rangelands
forage