Rangeland Ecology & Management

Get reliable science

Reply to Ortiz and Ames' Viewpoint: Sample adequacy for point analysis depends on the objectives
Author
Hofmann, L.
Ries, R. E.
Publisher
Society for Range Management
Publication Year
1992-11-01
Body

Editorial reply to "Viewpoint: sample adequacy for point analysis depends on the objectives," Journal of Range Management, vol. 45, no. 6, p. 595. This material was digitized as part of a cooperative project between the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. The Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information. Migrated from OJS platform August 2020

Language
en
Resource Type
Text
Document Type
Journal Issue/Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.2307/4002580
Additional Information
Hofmann, L., & Ries, R. E. (1992). Reply to Ortiz and Ames' viewpoint: Sample adequacy for point analysis depends on the objectives. Journal of Range Management, 45(6), 596.
IISN
0022-409X
OAI Identifier
oai:repository.arizona.edu:10150/644616
Journal Volume
45
Journal Number
6
Journal Pages
596
Journal Name
Journal of Range Management
Keywords
size
public opinion
mined soils
ground cover
reclamation
statistical analysis
vegetation
sampling