Rangeland Ecology & Management

Get reliable science

Comparison of techniques for determining the nutritional carrying capacity for white-tailed deer
Author
McCall, T. C.
Brown, R. D.
Bender, L. C.
Publisher
Society for Range Management
Publication Year
1997-01-01
Body

Estimates of carrying capacity for herbivores are useful for determining the relative value of different ranges. We compared 6 estimates of nutritional carrying capacity for white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus L.): digestible energy consumed by tame deer, and 5 methods using forage supplies of dry matter, digestible energy, digestible nitrogen, dry matter*digestible energy, and dry matter*digestible nitrogen in two 1-ha enclosures of different shrub plant communities in southern Texas. For the north enclosure, carrying capacity estimates (90% CI) were 3.65 (CI = 3.61-3.69), 4.5 (CI = 3.7-5.3), 9.4 (Cl = 73-11.5), 15.2 (CI = 11.6-18.8), 3.5 (CI = 2.7-4.3), and 3.5 (CI = 2.7-4.3) deer ha-1 58 days-1 for the digestible energy tame deer, dry matter, digestible energy, digestible nitrogen, dry matter*digestible energy, and dry matter*digestible nitrogen techniques, respectively. Corresponding estimates for the south enclosure were 2.6 (CI = 2.5-2.7), 3.5 (CI = 3.2-3.9), 6.8 (CI = 6.0-7.6), 10.1 (CI = 8.8-11.3), 2.1 (CI = 1.8-2.6), and 2.8 (CI = 2.4-3.1). Some methods for estimating carrying capacity provided different absolute estimates, but all produced similar relative estimates between enclosures. Similar relative results between enclosures suggests any of the methods can be used to determine the relative nutritional quality of plant communities. However, the dry matter-based technique was less expensive than the other techniques; therefore, there is no need to use more costly techniques for determining the relative stocking rates for white-tailed deer, unless forage quality differs greatly among plant communities. The Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information. Migrated from OJS platform August 2020

Language
en
Resource Type
Text
Document Type
Journal Issue/Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.2307/4002702
Additional Information
McCall, T. C., Brown, R. D., & Bender, L. C. (1997). Comparison of techniques for determining the nutritional carrying capacity for white-tailed deer. Journal of Range Management, 50(1), 33-38.
IISN
0022-409X
OAI Identifier
oai:repository.arizona.edu:10150/644220
Journal Volume
50
Journal Number
1
Journal Pages
33-38
Journal Name
Journal of Range Management
Keywords
Zanthoxylum fagara
digestible energy
costs and returns
grassland improvement
semiarid grasslands
carrying capacity
estimation
body weight
Odocoileus virginianus
natural grasslands
shrubs
nitrogen content
Texas
forage
dry matter
feed intake