Rangeland Ecology & Management

Get reliable science

Use of livestock and range management practice in Utah
Author
Coppock, D. L.
Birkenfeld, A. H.
Publisher
Society for Range Management
Publication Year
1999-01-01
Body

Despite large efforts to generate and extend management innovations for rangeland operators, little is known about the degree to which practices are used. We determined what influenced use of 26 management practices among 340 permittees using data from a mailed survey. Five, co-dominant socioeconomic groups of permittees were identified by cluster analysis: "Large-Scale Operators," 2 types of traditional "Ranchers," and 2 types of "Hobbyists." The main concern across groups was losing access to public land, and coping strategies overall included passivity (64%), intensification of private-land use (27%), and enterprise diversification (5%). Across all groups the 4 highest use rates uniformly occurred for livestock cross-breeding (92%), livestock supplementation (80%), planting improved forages on private land (76%), and interaction with extension personnel (73%). The 4 lowest rates (3 to 12%) occurred for use of futures markets, range-trend monitoring on private land, estrus synchronization, and short-duration grazing (SDG). Groups varied in use of feed and financial consultants, prescribed fire on private land, forward contracting, and controlled grazing systems other than SDG, with Large-Scale Operators tending to use these the most. Larger operation size and higher level of formal education and income for managers were positively associated with using more practices. Hobbyists tended to use practices the least. Practices which were less complex, clearly linked to animal production, potentially more cost-effective, and had greater compatibility with operational goals were favored. Socioeconomic groups and coping strategies have utility for better targeting research and extension. Understanding why some seemingly beneficial practices are rarely used requires improved communication with rangeland operators. The Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information. Migrated from OJS platform August 2020

Language
en
Resource Type
Text
Document Type
Journal Issue/Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.2307/4003486
Additional Information
Coppock, D. L., & Birkenfeld, A. H. (1999). Use of livestock and range management practice in Utah. Journal of Range Management, 52(1), 7-18.
IISN
0022-409X
OAI Identifier
oai:repository.arizona.edu:10150/644036
Journal Volume
52
Journal Number
1
Journal Pages
7-18
Journal Name
Journal of Range Management
Keywords
socioeconomic status
innovation adoption
farm surveys
farmers' income
livestock numbers
public domain
ranching
range management
Utah