Get reliable rangeland science

Is supplementation justified to compensate pastoral calves for milk restriction?
Author
Coppock, D. L.
Sovani, S.
Publisher
Society for Range Management
Publication Year
1999-05-01
Body

Competition for milk between calves and pastoral herders may reduce weaning weights, retard growth, and delay puberty in cattle. Calf supplementation could over-ride such effects and improve pastoral economies. To examine these issues in semiarid Ethiopia, 266 Boran calves (Bos indicus) were used in a 2 X 3 plus 1 factorial design contrasting graded levels of supplemental alfalfa hay (i.e., Medicago sativa L. with mean intakes of 0, 344, and 557 g head(-1) day(-1) on a DM basis) and supplemental water (i.e., with mean intakes of 0 and 3.8 liters head(-1) day(-1)). The trial was repeated for animals born in 2 consecutive years. Treatments occurred over a background of simulated traditional management in which calves had limited access to grazing and water and were allowed to suckle about two-thirds of their dams' daily milk yield. Traditionally managed controls received no supplements while other (positive) controls received no supplements but had greater access to milk. After 10 months of treatment calves were weaned and monitored. Supplementation with the high level of hay plus water markedly enhanced (P < 0.01) all productive features of calves at weaning compared to traditionally managed controls, and was an effective substitute for milk forgone in both years. Despite high variability in milk intake, access to supplements, and weaned body size as calves, all male cattle converged in liveweight and other productive features by 3.5 years of age, largely due to compensatory growth of traditionally managed controls. Heifers also converged in various attributes at maturity, but those which had received hay plus extra water as calves still conceived 2.6 to 4.3 months earlier (P < 0.05) than traditionally managed controls. We concluded that supplementation with hay and water can indeed compensate a young calf for typical levels of milk restriction here. Carry-over effects, however, were insufficient to justify large investments in supplementation considering the high inherent risks of production and traditions of marketing mature animals. The Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information. Migrated from OJS platform August 2020

Language
en
Resource Type
Text
Document Type
Journal Issue/Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.2307/4003682
Additional Information
Coppock, D. L., & Sovani, S. (1999). Is supplementation justified to compensate pastoral calves for milk restriction?. Journal of Range Management, 52(3), 208-217.
ISSN
0022-409X
OAI Identifier
oai:repository.arizona.edu:10150/643968
Journal Volume
52
Journal Number
3
Journal Pages
208-217
Collection
Rangeland Ecology & Management (REM)
Journal Name
Journal of Range Management
Keywords
restricted feeding
sucklings
Boran
puberty
birth weight
alfalfa
alfalfa hay
weaning weight
calf feeding
water intake
production costs
age
height
liveweight gain
calves
hay
feed supplements
feed intake