Rangeland Ecology & Management

Get reliable science

Effects of water quality on cattle performance
Author
Willms, W. D.
Kenzie, O. R.
McAllister, T. A.
Colwell, D.
Veira, D.
Wilmshurst, J. F.
Entz, T.
Olson, M. E.
Publisher
Society for Range Management
Publication Year
2002-09-01
Body

Water is an important nutrient for livestock production and is often provided on rangelands directly from ponds or dugouts. Cattle may defecate and urinate into the water thereby adding nutrients and reducing palatability. A study was conducted to examine the effects of water source on cattle production and behavior, to determine the relationship of selected chemical and biological constituents on the observed response and to test the effect of fecal contamination on water consumption. Four dugouts or ponds were selected at 4 sites: 2 in the Fescue Prairie near Stavely in southwestern Alberta, 1 in the Mixed Prairie at Onefour in southeastern Alberta, and 1 in the Palouse Prairie near Kamloops, British Columbia. Yearling Herefords were tested at 3 sites and Hereford cow-calf pairs at 1 Stavely site. At each site, three paddocks radiated from the pond that were stocked with 10 yearlings or cow-calf pairs randomly assigned to either clean water (water delivered to a trough from a well, river, or pond), pond water pumped to a trough (pond(trough)), or direct access into the pond (pond(direct)). The trials were repeated at each site for 3 to 6 years. Observations were made on cattle weight gains, cow backfat thickness, and activity budgets. Fecal samples were analyzed for selected parasites and pathogens. Other experiments were conducted to determine the effects of manure-contaminated water on feed and water consumption and water selection. Calves, with cows drinking clean water, gained 9% more (P < 0.10) weight than those with cows on pond(direct) but cow weight and backfat thickness were not affected. Yearling heifers having access to clean water gained 23% (P = 0.045) and 20% (P = 0.076) more weight than those on pond(direct) and pond(trough), respectively. Cattle avoided water that was contaminated with 0.005% fresh manure by weight when given a choice of clean water. Cattle that had access to clean water spent more time grazing and less time resting than those that were offered pond(trough) or pond(direct). Cattle management must consider water quality together with forage conditions in order to achieve optimal production from rangeland. The Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information. Migrated from OJS platform August 2020

Language
en
Resource Type
Text
Document Type
Journal Issue/Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.2307/4003222
Additional Information
Willms, W. D., Kenzie, O. R., McAllister, T. A., Colwell, D., Veira, D., Wilmshurst, J. F., ... & Olson, M. E. (2002). Effects of water quality on cattle performance. Journal of Range Management, 55(5), 452-460.
IISN
0022-409X
OAI Identifier
oai:repository.arizona.edu:10150/643683
Journal Volume
55
Journal Number
5
Journal Pages
452-460
Journal Name
Journal of Range Management
Keywords
microbial contamination
protozoal infections
nematode infections
Giardia
Cryptosporidium
Trichostrongylus
Nematodirus
algae and seaweeds
ponds
salinity
British Columbia
liveweight gain
calves
palatability
Alberta
cattle manure
water supply
water troughs
stocking rate
beef cows
feedlots
steers
prairies
water quality
grazing
beef cattle
ponds
dugouts
weight gain
water intake