Rangeland Ecology & Management

Get reliable science

Spatial modeling of rangeland potential vegetation environments
Author
Jensen, M. E.
Dibenedetto, J. P.
Barber, J. A.
Montagne, C.
Bourgeron, P. S.
Publisher
Society for Range Management
Publication Year
2001-09-01
Body

Potential vegetation environments (e.g., habitat types, range sites, ecological sites) are important to land managers because they provide a conceptual basis for the description of resource potentials and ecological integrity. Efficient use of potential vegetation classifications in regional or subregional scale assessments of ecosystem health has been limited to date, however, because traditional ecological unit mapping procedures often treat such classifications as ancillary information in the map unit description. Accordingly, it is difficult, if not impossible, to describe the precise location, patch size, and spatial arrangement of potential vegetation environments from most traditional ecological unit maps. Recent advances in remote sensing, geographic information systems (GIS), terrain modeling, and climate interpolation facilitate the direct mapping of potential vegetation through a predictive process based on gradient analysis and ecological niche theory. In this paper, we describe how a predictive vegetation mapping process was used to develop a 30 m raster-based map of 4 grassland, 5 shrubland, and 6 woodland habitat types across the Little Missouri National Grasslands, North Dakota. Discriminant analysis was used in developing this potential vegetation map based on 6 primary geographic information system themes. Geoclimatic subsections and remotely sensed vegetation lifeform maps were used in predictive model stratification. Terrain indices, LANDSAT satellite imagery, and interpolated climate information were used as independent (predictor) variables in model construction. A total of 616 field plots with known habitat type membership were used as dependent variables and assessed by a jackknife discriminant analysis procedure. Accuracy values of our map ranged from 54 to 77% in grasslands, 62 to 100% in shrublands, and 70 to 100% in woodlands dependent on geoclimatic subsection setting. Techniques are also described for generalizing the 30 m pixel resolution habitat type map to appropriate ecological unit maps (e.g., landtype associations) for use in ecosystem health assessments and land use planning. The Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information. Migrated from OJS platform August 2020

Language
en
Resource Type
Text
Document Type
Journal Issue/Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.2307/4003581
Additional Information
Jensen, M. E., Dibenedetto, J. P., Barber, J. A., Montagne, C., & Bourgeron, P. S. (2001). Spatial modeling of rangeland potential vegetation environments. Journal of Range Management, 54(5), 528-536.
IISN
0022-409X
OAI Identifier
oai:repository.arizona.edu:10150/643587
Journal Volume
54
Journal Number
5
Journal Pages
528-536
Journal Name
Journal of Range Management
Keywords
Little Missouri National Grasslands
satellite surveys
mapping
Landsat
shrublands
land use planning
habitats
topography
satellite imagery
grasslands
prediction
range condition
plant communities
woodlands
climatic factors
grazing
North Dakota
habitat types
ecological sites
range sites
ecological classification
geographic information systems
remote sensing
vegetation mapping
ecological units