Get reliable rangeland science

Herbaceous Vegetation Responses (1992-2004) to Restoration Treatments in a Ponderosa Pine Forest
Author
Moore, Margaret M.
Casey, Cheryl A.
Bakker, Jonathan D.
Springer, Judith D.
Fulé, Peter Z.
Covington, Wallace W.
Laughlin, Daniel C.
Publisher
Society for Range Management
Publication Year
2006-03-01
Body

Ecological restoration treatments are widely applied in southwestern ponderosa pine forests to convert them to an open canopy structure similar to that found at the time of Euro-American settlement. An experiment was initiated in northern Arizona in 1994 to evaluate long-term ecosystem responses to 3 restoration treatments: 1) thinning from below (thinning), 2) thinning from below plus forest floor manipulation with periodic prescribed burning (composite), and 3) an untreated control. Results focus on total herbaceous and functional-group standing crop response to these restoration treatments. Pretreatment data were collected in 1992 and posttreatment responses were measured from 1994 through 2004. Total herbaceous standing crop was significantly higher on the 2 treated areas than on the control over the entire posttreatment period, but did not differ between the thinning and composite treatments. Plant functional groups responded differently to treatments and to drought. In general, the graminoid standing crop responded within several years after the initial treatments and continued to increase through time, until a series of severe droughts reduced standing crop to pretreatment levels. C3 graminoids dominated the standing-crop response, of which bottlebrush squirreltail (Elymus elymoides (Raf.) Swezey ssp. elymoides) was the primary contributor. C4 graminoids had a minimal response to restoration treatments, possibly because they were less abundant before the experiment began or because they were adversely affected by autumn burning. Legumes and forbs exhibited a 4-5 year lag before responding to the thinning and composite treatments. Annual and biennial plants showed a large biomass increase approximately 5 years after implementation of the composite treatment. The restoration goal of optimizing herbaceous standing crop must be weighed against the competing goals of increasing the abundance of specific functional groups, increasing biodiversity or rare plants, and managing invasive plant species.  The Rangeland Ecology & Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information. Migrated from OJS platform August 2020 Legacy DOIs that must be preserved: 10.2458/azu_jrm_v59i2_moore

Language
en
Resource Type
Text
Document Type
Journal Issue/Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.2111/05-051R2.1
Additional Information
Moore, M. M., Casey, C. A., Bakker, J. D., Springer, J. D., Fulé, P. Z., Covington, W. W., & Laughlin, D. C. (2006). Herbaceous vegetation responses (1992–2004) to restoration treatments in a ponderosa pine forest. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 59(2), 135-144.
ISSN
0022-409X
OAI Identifier
oai:repository.arizona.edu:10150/643414
Journal Volume
59
Journal Number
2
Journal Pages
135-144
Collection
Rangeland Ecology & Management (REM)
Journal Name
Rangeland Ecology & Management
Keywords
understory production
overstory-understory relationships
thinning
prescribed fire
ecological restoration
Pinus ponderosa
Southwest
Gus Pearson Natural Area