Get reliable rangeland science

Differences in Food Ingestion and Digestion Among Sheep Classified as High or Low Sagebrush Consumers
Author
Fraker-Marble, M. J.
Launchbaugh, K. L.
Walker, J. W.
Publisher
Society for Range Management
Publication Year
2007-03-01
Body

Animals vary substantially in amount of three-tip sagebrush (Artemisia tripartita [Rydb.] tripartita) or other chemically defended plants they will voluntarily consume. This individual variation results from differences in dietary experience and inherited digestive characteristics. We conducted a series of experiments to examine behavioral and digestive traits of sheep identified as high or low consumers of sagebrush. In a pen-acceptance trial, high sagebrush consumers ate the same amount of sagebrush as low consumers when they had unrestricted access to a basal ration of alfalfa pellets (P = 0.77). However, when animals were restricted to 75% of their recommended energy requirement, sheep identified as high consumers ate more sagebrush than low consumers (P = 0.05). In a digestion trial, sagebrush reduced the dry matter digestibility when it was added to a hay-based diet. In vivo digestibility of a diet containing 10% fresh sagebrush and 90% alfalfa/grass hay was higher for high sagebrush consumers than low consumers (P = 0.02). The parameters measured in this trial suggest sheep that willingly consume high amounts of sagebrush, digest diets containing sagebrush more efficiently than low consumers.  The Rangeland Ecology & Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information. Migrated from OJS platform August 2020

Language
en
Resource Type
Text
Document Type
Journal Issue/Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.2111/05-169R2.1
Additional Information
Fraker-Marble, M. J., Launchbaugh, K. L., & Walker, J. W. (2007). Differences in food ingestion and digestion among sheep classified as high or low sagebrush consumers. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 60(2), 191-194.
ISSN
0022-409X
OAI Identifier
oai:repository.arizona.edu:10150/643146
Journal Volume
60
Journal Number
2
Journal Pages
191-194
Collection
Rangeland Ecology & Management (REM)
Journal Name
Rangeland Ecology & Management
Keywords
chemically defended plants
diet selection
digestion balance
grazing behavior
prescribed grazing