Rangeland Ecology & Management

Get reliable science

Property Rights Orientations and Rangeland Management Objectives: Texas, Utah, and Colorado
Author
Kreuter, Urs P.
Nair, Malini V.
Jackson-Smith, Douglas
Conner, Richard J.
Johnston, Janis E.
Publisher
Society for Range Management
Publication Year
2006-11-01
Body

In response to substantial economic and social dislocations in the United States, many rangeland owners are changing land use and management practices. Changes in land use can significantly affect the services rangeland ecosystems provide. Decisions associated with such changes are likely mediated by landowner views regarding individual rights, social responsibilities, and the future security of property rights. In this paper, we examine the extent to which landowners are likely to adopt, without public compensation, socially desirable land management objectives that enhance ecosystem services from rangelands. The study consisted of a mail survey of landowners with at least 40 ha: 500 in Texas, 500 in Utah, and 694 in Colorado. Adjusted responserates were 62% in Texas, 46% in Utah, and 51% in Colorado. Regression analyses showed that willingness to adopt socially desirable rangeland management objectives was positively correlated with the social responsibility dimension of respondents’ property rights orientations but negatively correlated with the rights erosion dimension. Our results also suggested that landowners in private land states, such as Texas, might be less willing than landowners in states with more public land to manage their land for the maintenance of ecosystem services without being compensated. Although the scope of our study was limited, the results suggest that agencies tasked with maintaining ecosystem services on private rangelands might more successfully achieve their mission by promoting social responsibility among landowners. Including community leaders with a highly developed sense of social responsibility in programs aimed at improving land stewardship and including peer-pressure incentives in such programs might enhance social responsibility perspectives among landowners. Such programs should also be adaptable at the state-level to account for differences in property-rights orientations relative to landowner dependence on private and public land. The Rangeland Ecology & Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information. Migrated from OJS platform August 2020 Legacy DOIs that must be preserved: 10.2458/azu_jrm_v59i6_kreuter

Language
en
Resource Type
Text
Document Type
Journal Issue/Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.2111/05-173R1.1
Additional Information
Kreuter, U. P., Nair, M. V., Jackson-Smith, D., Conner, J. R., & Johnston, J. E. (2006). Property rights orientations and rangeland management objectives: Texas, Utah, and Colorado. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 59(6), 632-639.
IISN
0022-409X
OAI Identifier
oai:repository.arizona.edu:10150/643116
Journal Volume
59
Journal Number
6
Journal Pages
632-639
Journal Name
Rangeland Ecology & Management
Keywords
landowner attitudes
land management
rangelands
social responsibility