Rangeland Ecology & Management

Get reliable science

View Point: Daubenmire Versus Line-Point Intercept: A Response to Thacker et al. (2015)
Author
Martyn, Trace E.
Beltz, Christopher W.
Palmquist, Kyle A.
Pennington, Victoria E.
Rottler, Caitlin M.
Lauenroth, William K.
Publisher
Society for Range Management
Publication Year
2015-12-01
Body

On the Ground • Thacker et al. compared two common techniques for assessing greater sage-grouse habitat: Daubenmire quadrats and line-point intercept sampling. • Sampling only 16 Daubenmire quadrats may not have been adequate to support Thacker et al.’s assertion that line-point sampling yields highercover values and that the two methods are not comparable. • Using data from sagebrush ecosystems in Montana, we show that mean percent cover changes depending on the number of Daubenmire quadrats sampled and that 16 Daubenmire quadrats may not be sufficient to accurately characterize sagebrush vegetation. • Assessing the appropriate sampling effort for the method and study is a crucial part of designing sampling protocols and has implications for greater sage-grouse management and conservation. The Rangelands archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information. Migrated from OJS platform March 2020

Language
en
Resource Type
Text
Document Type
Journal Issue/Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.1016/j.rala.2015.05.004
Additional Information
Martyn, T. E., Beltz, C. W., Palmquist, K. A., Pennington, V. E., Rottler, C. M., & Lauenroth, W. K. (2015). View Point: Daubenmire Versus Line-Point Intercept: A Response to Thacker et al.(2015). Rangelands, 37(4), 158-160.
IISN
0190-0528
OAI Identifier
oai:repository.arizona.edu:10150/640094
Journal Volume
37
Journal Number
4
Journal Pages
158-160
Collection
Journal Name
Rangelands
Keywords
Artemisia tridentata
Daubenmire quadrats
habitat assessment
line-point intercept
greater sage-grouse
sampling methodology
  • Practical, non-technical peer-reviewed articles published by the Society for Range Management. Access articles on a rolling-window basis from vol 1, 1979 up to 3 years from the current year. More recent content is available by subscription from SRM.