Get reliable rangeland science

Is Deferment Always Needed After Chemical Control of Sagebrush?
Author
Smith, D. R.
Publisher
Society for Range Management
Publication Year
1969-07-01
Body

The effects of 0, 1, 2, and 3 years of grazing deferment after sagebrush control were compared on subalpine ranges of the Big Horn Mountains in Wyoming. On units open to grazing, utilization of Idaho fescue was generally below the level which sustains yield under season-long grazing. Under such conditions, the desirable forage grasses quickly increased in vigor and revegetated the area after sagebrush was killed. Continued moderate utilization did not retard the revegetation process or influence the subsequent reinvasion of sagebrush. This material was digitized as part of a cooperative project between the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. The Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information. Migrated from OJS platform August 2020

Language
en
Resource Type
Text
Document Type
Journal Issue/Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.2307/3895929
Additional Information
Smith, D. R. (1969). Is Deferment Always Needed after Chemical Control of Sagebrush?. Journal of Range Management, 22(4), 261-263.
ISSN
0022-409X
OAI Identifier
oai:repository.arizona.edu:10150/649922
Journal Volume
22
Journal Number
4
Journal Pages
261-263
Collection
Rangeland Ecology & Management (REM)
Journal Name
Journal of Range Management
Keywords
Subalpine Ranges
Moderate Utilization
Soldier Creek
Antelope Butte
Big Horn Mountains
Idaho fescue
revegetation
season-long grazing
Reinvasion
Artemisia
yield
herbage production
chemical control
vigor
sagebrush
grazing
2,4-D
deferment
Wyoming