Get reliable rangeland science

Comparison of Tropical Forages of Known Composition with Samples of These Forages Collected by Esophageal Fistulated Animals
Author
Marshall, B.
Torell, D. T.
Bredon, R. M.
Publisher
Society for Range Management
Publication Year
1967-09-01
Body

The effect of saliva on esophageal fistula samples was minimal. Regression equations are presented which compare crude protein and crude fiber contents of esophageal fistula samples with those of forage of known composition. Squeezing esophageal fistula samples, air drying the solid portion, and treating the liquid portion with phenol will preserve samples where laboratory facilities are not available. This material was digitized as part of a cooperative project between the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. The Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information. Migrated from OJS platform August 2020

Language
en
Resource Type
Text
Document Type
Journal Issue/Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.2307/3895980
Additional Information
Marshall, B., Torell, D. T., & Bredon, R. M. (1967). Comparison of tropical forages of known composition with samples of these forages collected by esophageal fistulated animals. Journal of Range Management, 20(5), 310-313.
ISSN
0022-409X
OAI Identifier
oai:repository.arizona.edu:10150/647764
Journal Volume
20
Journal Number
5
Journal Pages
310-313
Collection
Rangeland Ecology & Management (REM)
Journal Name
Journal of Range Management
Keywords
treatments
samples
tropical forages
crude fiber
saliva
Squeezing
air drying
phenols
Zebu Steers
Herbage Offered
dry matter
techniques
esophageal fistula
crude protein
composition
sampling