Get reliable rangeland science

A Comparison of Three Methods for Estimating Forage Disappearance
Author
Sharrow, S. H.
Motazedian, I.
Publisher
Society for Range Management
Publication Year
1983-07-01
Body

Three methods of calculating forage disappearance from forage standing crop present on mowed versus protected plots were compared to the actual amount of forage harvested from mowed plots. The method most widely used by range scientists, the difference method, displayed a marked tendency to overestimate forage disappearance during periods of rapid plant growth or when plots were protected for more than 3 weeks. More accurate estimates of forage disappearance were generally obtained using formulae suggested by Linehan et al. (1947) and Bosch (1956) than could be obtained by the difference method. This material was digitized as part of a cooperative project between the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. The Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information. Migrated from OJS platform August 2020

Language
en
Resource Type
Text
Document Type
Journal Issue/Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.2307/3897942
Additional Information
Sharrow, S. H., & Motazedian, I. (1983). A comparison of three methods for estimating forage disappearance. Journal of Range Management, 36(4), 469-471.
ISSN
0022-409X
OAI Identifier
oai:repository.arizona.edu:10150/645819
Journal Volume
36
Journal Number
4
Journal Pages
469-471
Collection
Rangeland Ecology & Management (REM)
Journal Name
Journal of Range Management
Keywords
livestock
range and pasture studies
perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne)
subclover (Trifolium subterraneum)