Get reliable rangeland science

Comparison of four methods of grassland productivity assessment based on Festuca pallescens phytomass data
Author
Defossé, G. E.
Bertiller, M. B.
Publisher
Society for Range Management
Publication Year
1991-05-01
Body

The relative utility of 4 methods for grasslands above-ground net primary productivity (ANPP) assessment were evaluated. These methods, applied to a set of phytomass and litter data collected at about bimonthly intervals for 2 years in a Festuca pallescens (St. Yves) Parodi grassland steppe of southwestern Chubut, Argentina, were: (1) summation of positive increments of green (live) biomass between harvests, (2) summation of positive increments of total phytomass between harvests, (3) summation of positive increments of green biomass between harvests plus correction factors which accounted for the concomitant increases in dry, old dead, and litter, respectively, and (4) mathematical model of simultaneous differential equations which fitted the values of phytomass data obtained in the field. Method 1 gave consistently (p less than or equal to 0.05) the lowest ANPP values in both years. Productivity values obtained with methods 2, 3, and 4 were highly correlated and did not differ significantly (p less than or equal to 0.05) with each other. Their estimates varied from 94.9 to 105.3 g of dry matter per m2 for the first year and from 73.0 to 149.4 g of dry matter per m2 for the second year. These values are within the range of productivity given for other climatologically and physiognomically similar semiarid grasslands of North America. Each method except 1 provided reliable estimations of ANPP for the grassland studied. Methods 2, 3, and 4 can also be used to assess ANPP in any other grassland with similar characteristics. Each one, however, might have particular applications according to the specific objectives pursued. This material was digitized as part of a cooperative project between the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. The Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information. Migrated from OJS platform August 2020

Language
en
Resource Type
Text
Document Type
Journal Issue/Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.2307/4002940
Additional Information
Defossé, G. E., & Bertiller, M. B. (1991). Comparison of four methods of grassland productivity assessment based on Festuca pallescens phytomass data. Journal of Range Management, 44(3), 199-203.
ISSN
0022-409X
OAI Identifier
oai:repository.arizona.edu:10150/644681
Journal Volume
44
Journal Number
3
Journal Pages
199-203
Collection
Rangeland Ecology & Management (REM)
Journal Name
Journal of Range Management
Keywords
net primary productivity
dynamic models
Festuca
grasslands
estimation
productivity
biomass production