Rangeland Ecology & Management

Get reliable science

Short Duration Grazing at the Texas Experimental Ranch: Weight Gains of Growing Heifers
Author
Heitschmidt, R. K.
Frasure, J. R.
Price, D. L.
Rittenhouse, L. R.
Publisher
Society for Range Management
Publication Year
1982-05-01
Body

Total and average daily gains of Hereford/Angus crossbred growing heifers were contrasted between a continuously grazed (CG) treatment and a 10-pasture, 1-herd rapidly rotated short duration grazing (SDG) treatment. Stocking rate in the CG was 0.48 ha/AUM, a moderate rate, while stocking rate in the SDG treatment was 0.24 ha/AUM. Trials were conducted during the 1978 and 1979 growing seasons. Both total and average daily gains were similar in both treatments both years. Because of the two-fold difference in rate of stocking, production/ha was approximately double in the SDG to that in the CG treatment. It is tentatively concluded from the results of this and previous studies that a properly managed SDG system may satisfactorily support livestock at rates of stocking appreciably greater than that normally expected from conventional grazing schemes. This material was digitized as part of a cooperative project between the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. The Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information. Migrated from OJS platform August 2020

Language
en
Resource Type
Text
Document Type
Journal Issue/Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.2307/3898322
Additional Information
Heitschmidt, R. K., Frasure, J. R., Price, D. L., & Rittenhouse, L. R. (1982). Short duration grazing at the Texas Experimental Ranch: Weight gains of growing heifers. Journal of Range Management, 35(3), 375-379.
IISN
0022-409X
OAI Identifier
oai:repository.arizona.edu:10150/646256
Journal Volume
35
Journal Number
3
Journal Pages
375-379
Journal Name
Journal of Range Management
Keywords
Texas
forage quality