Rangeland Ecology & Management

Get reliable science

THE GRASS IS ALWAYS GREENER: QUANTIFYING OUTCOMES OF LOW-TECH RIPARIAN AND WET MEADOW RESTORATION USING REMOTE SENSING
Author
Silverman, Nicholas L.
Allred, Brady
Naugle, Dave
Donnelly, Patrick
Maestas, Jeremy
Publisher
Society for Range Management
Publication Year
2018
Body

Riparian and wet meadow landscapes make up a small percentage of the overall land area in the Western United States, yet their impacts on wildlife, vegetation, and water resources are profound. When healthy, these areas act as zones of soil water storage allowing for increased plant productivity, groundwater infiltration, and the slow, steady release of surface and sub-surface runoff. When these areas are functioning sub-optimally, the watershed as a whole suffers from increased drought and flood vulnerability, decreased plant productivity, and degraded fish and wildlife habitat. Over the last century unregulated livestock management, drought, non-native invasive weeds, and conifer encroachment have impacted the Intermountain West in ways that we are still recovering from today. Historically, much of the restoration that has taken place in the Intermountain West has largely focused on upland rangeland. It wasn�t until the late 1990s that practitioners began to focus on riparian and wet meadow restoration. While many of these restoration activities have been different in design, the processes they are meant to restore are often the same. Common to all these processes is the dynamic interplay between the hydrology and ecology of the landscape. In this study we use satellite remote sensing to explore changes in vegetation productivity (NDVI) of three distinct riparian/wet meadow restoration projects. The projects range widely in geographic location (Colorado, Oregon, and Nevada), restoration practice (Zeedyk structures, beaver dam analogs, and grazing management), and time since implementation, but are considered �low-cost� and �low-impact� solutions. We evaluate changes in plant productivity, in addition to changes in time above a riparian productivity threshold. We also explore changes in vegetation sensitivity to precipitation over time since restoration. Restoration practices resulted in increased vegetation productivity of up to 25% and increased persistence of productive vegetation�up to six months in some locations. Mesic restoration practices also led to increased resiliency, buffering vegetation productivity from climatic variability.

Language
English
Resource Type
Text
Document Type
Conference Proceedings
Conference Name
SRM Reno, NV