Rangeland Ecology & Management

Get reliable science

DEVELOPING A GRAZING STUDY VEGETATION MAP WITH REMOTE SENSING IN THE NORTHERN GREAT PLAINS
Author
Continanza, Fatima G.
Muscha, Jennifer
Steele, Caitriana M.
Petersen, Mark K.
Roberts, Andrew J.
Cibils, Andres F.
Publisher
Society for Range Management
Publication Year
2018
Body

Accurate mapping of rangeland vegetation is critical in studies of livestock spatial distribution. Our objective was to develop a detailed vegetation map to help model the drivers of beef heifer grazing behavior on Northern Great Plains rangeland at the USDA-ARS Fort Keogh LARRL, Miles City, MT. Remote sensing technologies for mapping vegetation are less time-intensive than traditional on-the-ground techniques and cover larger areas. However, map classes should correspond with vegetation classes of interest, and the accuracy of a final map product should be known. Unsupervised classification of National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP) imagery guided ground data collection for training / testing supervised classification. Two line point transects were read at 15 sites within each class to determine plant cover and species composition. A 2 m belt transect was read along each line point transect to determine shrubs density. We discriminated four classes. Class 1: Badlands - sparsely vegetated hills; 57.7 � 3.8 % bare ground (BG) and 998.7 � 151.4 shrubs/ha. Class 2: Mixed grass prairie, dominated by cool season grasses; 13.7 � 2.5 % BG and 227.5 � 65.1 shrubs/ha. Class 3: Shrublands with mixed grass prairie understory; 27.1 � 3.3 % BG and 765.1 � 124.8 shrubs/ha. Class 4: Cool season grasses/legumes and shrubs; 8.5 � 3.1 % BG and 1098.6 � 268.4 shrubs/ha. Training data class separability was evaluated using Jeffries-Matusita and transformed divergence methods (ENVI software). Values of 1.6 � 1.9 indicated that classes were sufficiently separable. We used ENVI�s maximum likelihood algorithm to classify combined NAIP, Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager and digital elevation datasets (spatial resolution sampled to 15 m). Testing data were used to develop a confusion matrix and to calculate Kappa. Overall accuracy was 89.1 % with Kappa = 0.8. We conclude that these results are acceptable for the scope of our study.

Language
English
Resource Type
Text
Document Type
Conference Proceedings
Conference Name
SRM Reno, NV